Abemaciclib data highlight Eli Lilly’s case on CDK 4/6
) k: w& C3 X# C$ ]! p3 o
8 z9 T* N) K, b2 N: }4 @Can Eli Lilly’s ($LLY) CDK 4/6 inhibitor abemaciclib still make a splash after Pfizer ($PFE) grabbed the pioneering OK in the field for palbociclib (Ibrance) and Novartis ($NVS) has touted a promising early end to their pivotal study for ribociclib?
2 [" j; N5 ?. v1 `! M5 e, c& j. ?& r7 s- _* t; Q/ q: q
The next big turning point on that front is looming as analysts look to see if Lilly can wrap its key franchise trial early as well. But a new Phase I study covering a range of cancers and published in Cancer Discovery underscores some of the reasons the FDA decided to hand out “breakthrough” status on abemaciclib. And it also highlights reasons why this drug still has potential to differentiate itself and vault ahead of its major league rivals.
& h" ]. R4 Q$ g! Y0 t$ h& D) M! x& k; O. C+ F% Y) ]0 i
CDK 4/6 inhibitors like abemaciclib are designed to block a key pathway in cell proliferation that runs amok when cancer takes root. Block that process early enough, and a drug can arrest a whole cascade of events that help drive cancer.
2 y- z3 A- b2 J. H# l- I% z u9 m) h
The key takeaways from the Lilly study: Unlike the two rivals, which are typically dosed three weeks on and one week off to manage the dose-limiting toxicity of neutropenia for their drugs, abemaciclib’s red flag is for severe fatigue, allowing for continual dosing. Prominent researchers in the study also highlight that Lilly’s drug apparently hits CDK 4 harder than 6, possibly sparing white blood cells. This may help explain why their drug has been able to score more significant data as a monotherapy than the rivals, which are provided as a combo with hormonal therapy.* X" ~ m# g D
; H$ v( U W2 m+ R) d“For the other two agents (palbociclib and ribociclib), the (single agent) response rates are low with these drugs,” says Dana Farber investigator Geoffrey Shapiro, who’s done work on all three big CDK 4/6 inhibitors. 0 N1 ^4 }5 [* F1 w( y" ]' m4 T+ v
" l9 g. u, F3 \8 B
“We have a fairly hefty response rate for hormone receptor-positive cancer. That’s a bit of a difference,” he adds, and perhaps a key reason why the FDA handed out the breakthrough title, which is intended to help facilitate the development process.: [/ G$ K7 j2 c
! T' q1 R9 f' ^9 q. K
To be sure, says Shapiro, much of what they’re still learning about abemaciclib is preliminary. Hammering away at CDK 4/6 continuously may improve efficacy, he notes, but it may also turn out that constant inhibition may actually encourage resistance, forcing the cancer to find a new pathway. On/off dosing might be able to avoid that, but a lot more work needs to be done before that point can be determined.
5 v) \& H1 W1 Z9 k: c. N& J3 Z* j1 T9 ` f5 `: M) p# A; x
Researchers recruited 225 patients for this study. In the expansion phase, abemaciclib was administered as a single agent to 47 patients with breast cancer, 68 with non-small cell lung cancer, 17 with glioblastoma, 26 with melanoma and 15 with colorectal cancer.! L9 e7 I, k# B. C; o/ n: V; n& @
: e ?( t/ s6 f0 {
Lilly was looking for a better idea of which patients would be most likely to respond and uncovered several key signs for hormone-receptor positive breast cancer and KRAS-mutant NSCLC.
0 o% `# A7 x z6 W$ u
7 z6 D3 q6 E' R& L) JOut of the 36 hormone receptor-positive breast cancer cases, 11 had a partial response while 18 patients had stable disease. Among 68 patients with NSCLC, there were only two partial responses and 31 cases of stable disease. Significantly, one of the partial responses and 12 instances of stable disease involved KRAS-mutant NSCLC.
! L1 A" H3 P) S, ~# W( {1 Z# U
9 K* W, R6 Z# @: _3 MIn breast cancer, the median PFS for the entire population was 5.8 months, Shapiro reports. The median PFS for the hormone receptor-positive population was 8.8 months.
) \4 q+ p( E# T8 {% }
1 c( {. b( l' I2 r: t$ ~9 l$ B“All breast cancer patients who achieved RECIST response (The Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors for judging a response) were hormone-receptor positive. Among these patients, the median duration of response was 13.4 months.# g% \. p* v L3 M
7 ?; _: r& m8 }( S% @! ?* c8 y$ I
In lung cancer: Among patients with tumors harboring KRAS mutation, 9 out of the 29 had a PFS rate greater than 24 weeks (6 months). “Among patients with KRAS wild type tumors, 4/33 had PFS > 24 weeks (6 months). Also, of 4 patients who received abemaciclib > 12 months, 3 had tumor harboring KRAS mutation.
9 G* a5 l: \" y, G- B+ K2 {. z9 s! ^; Y) z: t
“It is noteworthy that KRAS mutated lung cancer is subdivided into KRAS alone,” noted Shapiro, “KRAS with concomitant TP53 mutation and KRAS with concomitant LKB1 (STK11) loss. KRAS/LKB1 predicts an especially aggressive phenotype. Tumor regressions were noted across these subdivisions of KRAS mutant lung cancer.
, N4 w( t T$ _+ ^+ o, |) R# f( a) O! D0 [% m8 S; H# P
“So, although more work needs to be done to truly identify the lung cancer population most likely to benefit from abemaciclib monotherapy, these data in KRAS mutant disease are very promising. X. A+ j" G' T7 m4 \
: |# p# A( `* p“Finally, for your question about ‘what did we learn, or ‘what was surprising or confirmed,’” adds Shapiro, “it is noteworthy that we confirmed preclinical models indicating abemaciclib can cross the blood brain barrier. Among glioblastoma patients, cerebrospinal fluid concentrations approximated those in plasma, and 2 glioblastoma patients have achieved very long term benefit on abemaciclib.”# e3 [# @' f# h- O! i$ ]
( E$ g: t: w" X+ e' WProvided the data hold up in the first pivotal study, an approval for Eli Lilly is almost assured. The FDA understands this mechanism well, has been working with three big players that have devoted significant resources to the trials and gave breakthrough status to Pfizer and Lilly to help hurry things along., A3 o: P* X. A( J' ~1 S7 f
5 a1 X& _- `- r$ EWhether Lilly can make the big jump to top contender for this blockbuster market, though, remains to be seen. And Pfizer’s investigators haven’t hesitated to counter that abemaciclib could have severe gastrointestinal issues.
8 H$ K) ]. H7 d6 Y8 z
- Z% i, i4 _, n# t% V4 _3 A W6 b, \With billions at stake, all the stops are being pulled out.
- C, r/ q. D$ R% Z% \- w# h. j- g) F3 u& m! W9 A$ ?4 r8 t' x0 U
" r( C! ^+ |) M# h/ z4 d, j) F0 j
http://www.fiercebiotech.com/abe ... lting-ahead-cdk-4-6 |
跨越十年丨憨叔靶向轮换的感悟及思路
我们在筷子治疗九周年纪念文章《跨越九年丨憨叔靶向轮换传承和发扬 --筷子奥希替尼
egfr19突变，16个月耐药，后续该如何
2023.7月爸爸确诊肺癌晚期，全身多处骨转 脑转，基因检测egfr19突变，单用阿美11个月
[9.20更新紧急求助］K药单免，肺部大
我父亲5月30,6月20，分别使用两次K药治疗。后因为肠道免疫副反应停止了K药直到现在.
免疫治疗的副作用有何征兆？可以预防
我们常说的抗肿瘤免疫治疗，多指以PD-1/PD-L1抑制剂为代表的免疫抑制剂，通过激活患
建议收藏！肺癌ALK患者靶向药耐药后
作者：闵
ALK突变常被众多病友称为“钻石突变”，不单是由于对应的靶向药价格高昂，更
显身卡
